The Government Shutdown
(NOTE: Published January 18, 2019 on LinkedIn)
This piece from NPR
(https://www.npr.org/2019/01/18/685829213/attempts-to-make-shutdown-painless-may-stretch-limits-of-federal-law)
notes that attempts to ease the pain of the shutdown might be illegal. Or not.
At any rate, there is disagreement among legal experts regarding how the
federal Anti-deficiency Act should be interpreted. Can the administration order
essential employees (those required for safety and security) to work
indefinitely? Further, can the administration order others to work, like employees
of the IRS, because they have important jobs to do, like process income tax
returns?
Whatever the answer, it
is becoming increasingly clear that this shutdown will be bad for business. We
no longer live in the "dual federal" republic where the national
government has some jobs, the states and localities have others, and never shall
these meet. Many programs are not only jointly funded (think of Medicaid) but
jointly administered. USDA programs are embedded with counties and
universities. Funding from the federal government for some positions in states
and localities may suffer, with states picking up the tabs. Emergency
management is, by design, a multi-jurisdictional and multi-level model.
More to the point of
business, the mortgage business might start to bog down as FHA and VA
guaranteed loan processing grinds to a halt. Of course, this has a downstream
effect on real estate sales and possibly new home construction. We are hearing
reports of restaurants losing traffic in the Washington, D.C. area. Not a fan
of the beltway? What about the towns and businesses making money outside the
gates of National Parks? And whatever your view of SNAP (formerly food stamps),
the indisputable fact is that this program is beneficial for retail grocery
businesses.
And lest we forget, some
of the federal government's most important public health and safety workers are
still working. They are just working without pay. This list includes air
traffic controllers, FAA aircraft inspectors, TSA security personnel, employees
of the National Weather Service, border patrol officers, federal police and
fire employees, and the U.S. Coast Guard. On the weekend of the Super Bowl,
people with the means to do so will converge on Atlanta (one of the busiest
airports in the world), while the people making sure their trip is safe will
work without pay. Also of note, the Coast Guard is the one military branch
working without pay. Currently, Coast Guard members intercept drug smugglers in
international waters in the Western Hemisphere and have a deployed contingent
stationed in Bahrain and patrolling the Arabian Sea. So yes, we have deployed
military members with spouses and children waiting at home, but not getting
their normal pay.
No matter your view of
the disagreement between the President and Congress, it seems increasingly
obvious that a government shutdown is not the way to handle the disagreement.
No private sector employer, including those who post jobs on LinkedIn, would
operate this way. Imagine, LinkedIn alerts you to the availability of a job
that fits your qualifications, and encourages you to apply. Of course, the job
has one drawback--you will not get a paycheck. It is nice to thank TSA agents
for their service. It is nice to buy a Coast Guardsman a cup of coffee in the
airport. But they are working not only because they are patriotic, they are
working because they have jobs. Public service motivation does not put food on
the table, nor does it pay the rent. An employment model like this cannot be
sustained. It is already affecting the lives of real humans, and will
increasingly affect businesses. Perhaps then it will get our attention.
Comments
Post a Comment